4.5 Article

Effect of exposure to root canal irrigants on the push-out bond strength of calcium silicate-based cements

Journal

CLINICAL ORAL INVESTIGATIONS
Volume 25, Issue 5, Pages 3267-3274

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00784-020-03658-x

Keywords

Total Fill; Biodentine; MTA; Push-out bond strength; Root canal irrigants; Etidronic acid

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aimed to compare the push-out bond strength of three calcium silicate-based cements under different treatment conditions, finding that the effects varied among the cements, with NaOCl+HEBP having no detrimental effect on the POBS of CSBC.
Objectives The aim of this study was to compare the push-out bond strength (POBS) of three calcium silicate-based cements (CSBC) after exposure to saline, sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl), ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), and a mixture of NaOCl and etidronic acid (NaOCl+HEBP) in simulated perforation. Materials and methods A total of 180 dentin slices were perforated and then filled with either Biodentine (BD), ProRoot MTA (PMTA), or Total Fill (TF). After 1 week, specimens in each group were divided into 4 subgroups (n = 15) according to the root canal irrigant (RCI) that their coronal surface was exposed to: saline, 5.25% NaOCl, 17% EDTA, or a mixture of 5.25% NaOCl and 9% HEBP (NaOCl+HEBP). A push-out test was performed, and the failure pattern was assessed. POBS data were analyzed with ANOVA and Tukey post hoc tests and the failure patterns with chi-square test. Results No differences were found when comparing the effect of RCI on the POBS of PMTA. BD showed significantly higher POBS values after exposure to NaOCl+HEBP (p < .05), and those of TF were significantly lower after exposure to EDTA (p < .05). No differences in the failure patterns were found among groups. Conclusion NaOCl+HEBP had no detrimental effect on the POBS of CSBC.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available