4.3 Article

Quantum transport simulation of graphene-nanoribbon field-effect transistors with defects

Journal

JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL ELECTRONICS
Volume 20, Issue 1, Pages 21-37

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10825-020-01588-1

Keywords

Quantum transport; Graphene nanoribbon; Defects

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [1710066]
  2. Directorate For Engineering
  3. Div Of Electrical, Commun & Cyber Sys [1710066] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Defects, such as single vacancies, in gate-all-around graphene nanoribbons field-effect transistors have been found to impact the charge-transport properties, with edge defects affecting the I-on/I-off ratio more significantly and having a stronger effect in wider ribbons. This indicates the importance of controlling material quality at the atomic level in proposed technologies based on graphene nanoribbons.
We present a theoretical study of the effect of defects on the charge-transport properties of gate-all-around graphene nanoribbons field-effect transistors. Electronic transport is treated atomistically using an efficient method we have recently proposed that makes use of a Bloch-wave basis obtained from empirical pseudopotentials and solves the Schrodinger equation with open boundary conditions using the quantum transmitting boundary method. The defects considered here consist in single vacancies at different locations in the ribbon (center and edge of the ribbon; in the source or drain regions or along the channel). We have found that vacancies located at different locations along the ribbon width alter differently the Kekule patterns: Defects at the edge reduce the I-on/I-off more than defects located near the center of the ribbon, and the effect is stronger in narrow ribbons. These results show that any proposed technology based on graphene nanoribbons must be able to control the quality of the material down to a single atom.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available