4.4 Review

The impact of prurigo nodularis on quality of life: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Journal

ARCHIVES OF DERMATOLOGICAL RESEARCH
Volume 313, Issue 8, Pages 669-677

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00403-020-02148-0

Keywords

Besnier; Chronic itch; DLQI; EQ5D; Hyde’ s prurigo; Itch; IchyQoL; Meta-analysis; Nodular prurigo; NRS; Prurigo; Prurigo nodularis; Pruritis; Pruritus; QoL; Quality of life; Systematic review; VAS; VRS

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The quality of life is negatively impacted in PN patients, with significant reductions compared to control groups. The most commonly used quality of life measurement tool is the Dermatology Life Quality Index, showing substantial impact of PN across multiple domains of quality of life.
Prurigo nodularis (PN) is a chronic, pruritic, debilitating disease. Previous studies found that chronic pruritus in general negatively affects patients' quality of life (QoL). However, results about the impact of PN on QoL are conflicting. Our objective was to assess the QoL burden of PN. A systematic review was conducted of all published studies that assessed QoL measures in PN. OVID MEDLINE, EMBASE, SCOPUS, and Web of Science were searched. Pooled meta-analysis (means) was performed using random-effects weighting. Overall, 13 studies met inclusion criteria. All studies identified QoL reductions in patients suffering from PN compared to control groups. The most common QoL instrument used was the Dermatology Life Quality Index [n = 9 studies; pooled mean (95% confidence interval): 13.8 (10.6-16.9), denoting a very large effect]. In particular, PN was associated with substantial impact on multiple domains of QoL. No publication bias was detected. In conclusion, QoL is negatively impacted in PN. Future studies are necessary to determine the best instruments of measuring QoL in PN patients, better understand this association, and assess the impact in males and females separately. PROSPERO CRD42019136193.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available