4.7 Article

Illuminating single genomic loci in live cells by reducing nuclear background fluorescence

Journal

SCIENCE CHINA-LIFE SCIENCES
Volume 64, Issue 5, Pages 667-677

Publisher

SCIENCE PRESS
DOI: 10.1007/s11427-020-1794-2

Keywords

CRISPR; dCas9 labeling; background reduction; low-repetitive loci; live cell imaging

Categories

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21890743]
  2. Chinese Academy of Sciences, China [XDB29050100]
  3. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2017YFA0205503]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study successfully reduced the number of fluorescent modules entering the nucleus by redesigning the CRISPR/dCas9-SunTag labeling system, resulting in decreased background fluorescence and increased signal-to-background ratio.
The tagging of genomic loci in living cells provide visual evidence for the study of genomic spatial organization and gene interaction. CRISPR/dCas9 (clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats/deactivated Cas9) labeling system labels genes through binding of the dCas9/sgRNA/fluorescent protein complex to repeat sequences in the target genomic loci. However, the existence of numerous fluorescent proteins in the nucleus usually causes a high background fluorescent readout. This study aims to limit the number of fluorescent modules entering the nucleus by redesigning the current CRISPR/dCas9-SunTag labeling system consisting of dCas9-SunTag-NLS (target module) and scFv-sfGFP-NLS (signal module). We removed the nuclear location sequence (NLS) of the signal module and inserted two copies of EGFP into the signal module. The ratio of the fluorescent intensity of the nucleus to that of the cytoplasm (N/C ratio) was decreased by 71%, and the ratio of the signal to the background (S/B ratio) was increased by 1.6 times. The system can stably label randomly selected genomic loci with as few as 9 repeat sequences.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available