4.5 Review

Quinolone immediate hypersensitivity due to topical ophthalmic preparations: a case report and review of literature

Journal

JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY
Volume 48, Issue 3, Pages 389-391

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/1346-8138.15669

Keywords

basophil activation test; eyedrop; immediate hypersensitivity; Mas‐ related G‐ protein coupled receptor X2; quinolone

Categories

Funding

  1. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology [24390276]
  2. Health and Labor Sciences Research Grants from the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare of Japan
  3. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [24390276] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A case of immediate hypersensitivity induced by ophthalmic administration of quinolones in a 20-year-old female with bacterial conjunctivitis is reported, with skin prick and basophil activation tests suggesting a type Ib reaction associated with Mas-related G-protein coupled receptor X2. This case serves as a caution to be aware of quinolone immediate hypersensitivity caused by topical ophthalmic preparations, which may predict severe hypersensitivity reactions to systemic administration.
Ophthalmic quinolone preparations are widely used for the treatment of eye diseases; however, there are only a few reported cases of immediate hypersensitivity due to such medications. Here, we present a case of immediate hypersensitivity induced by an ophthalmic administration of quinolones in a 20-year-old female with bacterial conjunctivitis. The results of skin prick and basophil activation tests suggest that it involved a type Ib reaction associated with Mas-related G-protein coupled receptor X2. The present case cautions us to be aware of quinolone immediate hypersensitivity caused by topical ophthalmic preparations, which can easily be overlooked, because it may predict severe hypersensitivity reactions to systemic administration.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available