4.4 Article

Team-level human resource attributions and performance

Journal

HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT JOURNAL
Volume 31, Issue 3, Pages 753-774

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/1748-8583.12330

Keywords

attribution theory; human resource attributions; team engagement; team performance; self‐ awareness of transformational leadership

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [NSFC] [72072075]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study examines the relationship between team-level human resource attributions (HRAs) and team performance, with a focus on how transformational leadership moderates this relationship. The results show that commitment-focused team-level HRAs impact team performance through team engagement, and that self-awareness of transformational leadership strengthens this positive relationship. However, no similar moderated mediation relationships were found between control-focused team-level HRAs and team performance.
Drawing on attribution theory, this study explores the relationship between team-level human resource attributions (HRAs) and team performance, and explains how transformational leadership moderates this relationship. The data were collected from leaders and subordinates across 77 work teams, for a total of 708 participants employed in seven manufacturing and service organizations in China. The study finds that the relationship between commitment-focused team-level HRAs and team performance is mediated by team engagement, and that self-awareness of transformational leadership significantly strengthens the positive relationship between these variables. However, parallel moderated mediation relationships are not evident between control-focused team-level HRAs and team performance. The study is among the first to explore team-level HRAs and contributes to the scholarly debates on the role of attributions in explaining the so-called 'black box' between HRM and performance.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available