4.3 Article

A Theory of Change for promoting coexistence between dingoes and livestock production

Journal

CONSERVATION SCIENCE AND PRACTICE
Volume 3, Issue 3, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/csp2.304

Keywords

human dimensions of wildlife; human– wildlife conflict; Theory of Change

Funding

  1. Holsworth Wildlife Research Endowment
  2. Royal Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (Alan White Scholarship)
  3. Paddy Pallin Science Grant (Royal Zoological Society of New South Wales)
  4. Society for Conservation Biology Graduate Student Research Fellowship

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study developed a Theory of Change (ToC) aimed at promoting coexistence between livestock producers and dingoes in Australia based on behavior change principles and interdisciplinary research. The ToC identifies four key stakeholder groups and employs four overlapping strategies, including media campaign, inclusive decision-making processes, monitoring and evaluation, and encouraging adoption of nonlethal management methods by livestock producers.
Achieving conservation goals, such as coexistence between wildlife and humans, requires an evidence-based understanding of the factors that shape conservation contexts. For addressing conflict between humans and wildlife, this means understanding the barriers and opportunities to changing human behaviors toward wildlife. Here, we develop a Theory of Change (ToC) to promote coexistence between livestock producers and dingoes in Australia. The ToC is based on behavior change principles and interdisciplinary research identifying four key stakeholder groups who may influence dingo management. It employs four overlapping strategies to address these barriers: (a) a media campaign to promote public awareness of dingo management practices, which may result in pressure upon governments to restrict lethal control; (b) promoting more inclusive decision-making processes, specifically including Aboriginal Australians; (c) monitoring and evaluation of the effects of dingo management on livestock and ecosystems to identify opportunities for nonlethal dingo management; (d) campaign to encourage adoption of nonlethal management methods by livestock producers based on an understanding of sociopsychological factors that shape behaviors. The framework is a tool for conservation advocates and policymakers to implement and monitor change that facilitates both wildlife conservation and thriving rural communities.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available