4.4 Review

Lupus animal models and neuropsychiatric implications

Journal

CLINICAL RHEUMATOLOGY
Volume 40, Issue 7, Pages 2535-2545

Publisher

SPRINGER LONDON LTD
DOI: 10.1007/s10067-020-05493-7

Keywords

Animal models; Neuropsychiatric lupus; Pristane-induced lupus; Systemic lupus erythematosus

Categories

Funding

  1. Research Incentive Fund (FIPE/HCPA) [18-0246]
  2. Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico Universal (MCTI/CNPQ) [28/2018]
  3. Research Support Fund of the Sociedade de Reumatologia do Rio Grande do Sul

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study discusses animal models of neuropsychiatric systemic lupus erythematosus (NPSLE), including spontaneous models and induced models. The PIL model is believed to exhibit major clinical and laboratory manifestations of SLE, but research on its mimicry of NPSLE is still limited.
Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) that involves neurological complications is known as neuropsychiatric systemic lupus erythematosus (NPSLE). Research in humans is difficult due to the disease's great heterogeneity. Animal models are a resource for new discoveries. In this review, we examine experimental models of lupus that present neuropsychiatric manifestations. Spontaneous animal models such as NZB/W F1 and MRL/lpr are commonly used in NPSLE research; these models present few SLE symptoms compared to induced animal models, such as pristane-induced lupus (PIL). The PIL model is known to present eight of the main clinical and laboratory manifestations of SLE described by the American College of Rheumatology. Many cytokines associated with NPSLE are expressed in the PIL model, such as IL-6, TNF-alpha, and IFN. However, to date, NPSLE manifestations have been poorly studied in the PIL model. In this review article, we discuss whether the PIL model can mimic neuropsychiatric manifestations of SLE.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available