4.4 Article

Prophylactic negative-pressure wound therapy after ileostomy reversal for the prevention of wound healing complications in colorectal cancer patients: a randomized controlled trial

Journal

TECHNIQUES IN COLOPROCTOLOGY
Volume 25, Issue 2, Pages 185-193

Publisher

SPRINGER-VERLAG ITALIA SRL
DOI: 10.1007/s10151-020-02372-w

Keywords

Prophylactic negative pressure wound therapy; Ileostomy closure; Prevention of wound-related complications; Colorectal cancer operation; Randomized controlled trial

Funding

  1. Jagiellonian University Medical College
  2. NPWT equipment producers

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Protective negative-pressure wound therapy (NPWT) after diverting ileostomy closure in colorectal cancer patients reduces the incidence of wound healing complications (WHC) and surgical site infections (SSI), leading to shorter time for complete wound healing.
Background The aim of this study was to assess the usefulness of protective negative-pressure wound therapy (NPWT) in the reduction of wound healing complications (WHC) and surgical site infections (SSI) after diverting ileostomy closure in patients who underwent surgery for colorectal cancer. Methods In this prospective randomized clinical trial in a tertiary academic surgical center, patients who had colorectal cancer surgery with protective loop ileostomy and were scheduled to undergo ileostomy closure with primary wound closure from January 2016 to December 2018 were randomized to be treated with or without NPWT. The primary endpoint was the incidence of WHC. Secondary endpoints were incidence of SSI, length of postoperative hospital stay (LOS), and length of complete wound healing (CWH) time. Results We enrolled 35 patients NPWT (24 males [68.6%]; mean age 61.6 +/- 11.3 years), with NPWT and 36 patients (20 males [55.6%]; mean age 62.4 +/- 11.3 years) with only primary wound closure (control group). WHC was observed in 11 patients (30.6%) in the control group and 3 (8.57%) in the NPWT group (p = 0.020). Patients in the NPWT group had a significantly lower incidence of SSI (2 [5.71%] vs. 8 [22.2%] in the control group; p = 0.046) as well as significantly shorter median CWH (7 [7-7] days vs. 7 [7-15.5] days, p = 0.030). There was no difference in median LOS between groups (3 [2.5-5] days in the control group vs. 4 [2-4] days in the NPWT group; p = 0.072). Conclusions Prophylactic postoperative NPWT after diverting ileostomy closure in colorectal cancer patients reduces the incidence of WRC and SSI.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available