4.6 Article

Acute viral bronchiolitis as a cause of pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS
Volume 180, Issue 4, Pages 1229-1234

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00431-020-03852-9

Keywords

Bronchiolitis; Children; ARDS; Intensive care; Respiratory syncytial virus; RSV

Categories

Funding

  1. Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust
  2. Egyptian Ministry of Higher Education

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study evaluated the incidence of PARDS in AVB, highlighting RSV as a common trigger pathogen and bacterial infection as a risk factor for PARDS development in infants with AVB.
The Pediatric Acute Lung Injury Consensus Conference (PALICC) published pediatric-specific guidelines for the definition, management, and research in pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome (PARDS). Acute viral bronchiolitis (AVB) remains one of the leading causes of admission to PICU. Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is the most common cause of AVB. We aimed to evaluate the incidence of PARDS in AVB and identify the risk of RSV as a trigger pathogen for PARDS. This study is a retrospective single-center observational cohort study including children < 2 years of age admitted to the pediatric intensive care unit at St Mary's Hospital, London, and presented with AVB in 3 years (2016-2018). Clinical and demographic data was collected; PALICC criteria were applied to define PARDS. Data was expressed as median (IQR range); non-parametric tests were used. In this study, 144 infants with acute viral bronchiolitis were admitted to PICU in the study period. Thirty-nine infants fulfilled criteria of PARDS with RSV as the most common virus identified. Bacterial infection was identified as a risk factor for development of PARDS in infants with AVB. Conclusion: AVB is an important cause of PARDS in infants. RSV is associated with a higher risk of PARDS in AVB. Bacterial co-infection is a significant risk factor for development of PARDS in AVB.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available