4.7 Article

TOuNN: Topology Optimization using Neural Networks

Journal

STRUCTURAL AND MULTIDISCIPLINARY OPTIMIZATION
Volume 63, Issue 3, Pages 1135-1149

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00158-020-02748-4

Keywords

Neural networks; Machine learning; Topology optimization

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [CMMI 1561899]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, a new topology optimization method is proposed using neural networks to represent and optimize the density field, resulting in sharp and differentiable boundaries. The research demonstrates that the method is simple to implement and illustrates its application through 2D and 3D examples. Some unresolved challenges with the proposed framework are also summarized.
Neural networks, and more broadly, machine learning techniques, have been recently exploited to accelerate topology optimization through data-driven training and image processing. In this paper, we demonstrate that one can directly execute topology optimization (TO) using neural networks (NN). The primary concept is to use the NN's activation functions to represent the popular Solid Isotropic Material with Penalization (SIMP) density field. In other words, the density function is parameterized by the weights and bias associated with the NN, and spanned by NN's activation functions; the density representation is thus independent of the finite element mesh. Then, by relying on the NN's built-in backpropogation, and a conventional finite element solver, the density field is optimized. Methods to impose design and manufacturing constraints within the proposed framework are described and illustrated. A byproduct of representing the density field via activation functions is that it leads to a crisp and differentiable boundary. The proposed framework is simple to implement and is illustrated through 2D and 3D examples. Some of the unresolved challenges with the proposed framework are also summarized.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available