4.5 Article

Estimating the synergistic and antagonistic effects of dual antibiotics on plants through root elongation test

Journal

ECOTOXICOLOGY
Volume 30, Issue 8, Pages 1598-1609

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10646-020-02308-y

Keywords

Antibiotic; Effective concentration; Root elongation; TU; SR method; CA; IA model

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41761094]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study evaluated the toxicity of different antibiotics on pakchoi root elongation using independent action and concentration addition models, revealing the presence of low-dose synergy and high-dose antagonism. The reliability of predicting combined toxicity using IA and CA models depends heavily on analysis of Toxic Unit or Synergistic Ratio.
Antibiotics are recently recognized as a group of emerging environmental contaminants that are frequently detected in various environmental matrixes. Relative root elongation (RRE) test is a rapid and effective strategy to evaluate the water/soil quality and the toxic effects of environmental contaminants on plants. In the present study, we examine the toxicity effect of ciprofloxacin (CIP), norfloxacin (NOR), and tetracycline (TET) to pakchoi individually and in combinations. Both independent action (IA) and concentration addition (CA) models are used for toxicity assessment. Results showed that the EC50 values of CIP, NOR, and TET are 193.59, 60.81, and 40.37 mu M, respectively. Combinations of TET + CIP and TET + NOR caused more inhibitory effects on root elongation than those of CIP + NOR. Toxic Unit (TU) and Synergistic Ratio (SR) analysis showed that the relatively lower (higher) EC values are observed in the combinations with lower (higher) antibiotic concentrations, suggesting an effect of low-dose synergism and high-dose antagonism. The reliability of the simulation results from IA and CA models to predict that combined toxicity is highly dependent upon the results from the analysis of TU or SR.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available