4.7 Article

Comparison of tension wood and normal wood for oxidative nanofibrillation and network characteristics

Journal

CELLULOSE
Volume 28, Issue 2, Pages 1085-1104

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10570-020-03556-1

Keywords

Cellulose nanofibril; Nanofibrillation; Fibril network; TEMPO oxidation; Tension wood; Wood properties

Funding

  1. Lulea University of Technology

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Cellulose nanofibrils (CNFs) obtained from tension wood (TW) and normal wood (NW) were compared in this study, with TW showing higher crystallinity and toughness in CNF networks due to better preservation of hierarchical cellulose structures. This knowledge can facilitate the breeding and design of wood feedstocks for nanoscale renewable materials.
Cellulose nanofibrils (CNFs) are top-down nanomaterials obtainable from abundant lignocelluloses. Despite recent advances in processing technologies, the effects of variations in the lignocellulose structure and composition on CNF isolation and properties are poorly understood. In this study, we compared the isolation of CNFs from tension wood (TW) and normal wood (NW) from Populus tremula (aspen). The TW has a higher cellulose content, native cellulose fibrils with a larger crystalline diameter, and less lignin than the NW, making it an interesting material for CNF isolation. The wood powders were oxidized directly by 2,2,6,6-tetramethylpiperidin-1-oxyl, and the morphology and mechanical behaviors of the nanofibril suspensions and networks were characterized. The TW was more difficult to fibrillate by both chemical and mechanical means. Larger nanofibrils (5-10 nm) composed of 1.2 nm structures were present in the TW CNFs, whereas the NW samples contained more of thin (1.6 nm) structures, which also comprised 77% of the solid yield compared to the 33% for TW. This difference was reflected in the TW CNF networks as decreased transmittance (15% vs. 50%), higher degree of crystallinity (85.9% vs. 78.0%), doubled toughness (11 MJ/m(3)) and higher elongation at break (12%) compared to NW. The difference was ascribed to greater preservation of the hierarchical, more crystalline microfibril structure, combined with a more cellulose-rich network (84% vs. 70%). This knowledge of the processing, structure, and properties of CNFs can facilitate the breeding and design of wood feedstocks to meet the increasing demand for nanoscale renewable materials. [GRAPHICS] .

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available