4.7 Article

Using the analytical heirarchy process to select specific methanation catalysts based on their extraction impacts

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENERGY RESEARCH
Volume 45, Issue 4, Pages 5827-5840

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/er.6203

Keywords

analytical hierarchy process; catalysts; lifecycle assessment; methanation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study examines the environmental impacts of a selection of methanation catalysts in industrial scale synthetic natural gas production using the analytical hierarchy process (AHP). It is found that catalysts containing common metals have the lowest environmental impact per conversion rate, while catalysts containing ruthenium are the most detrimental to the environment despite offering favorable conversion rates in methanation reactors.
Methanation is an exothermic process that utilizes catalysts to convert the carbon dioxide and carbon monoxide in biogas to methane, forming synthetic natural gas. The criteria for determining a suitable catalyst should not only be its effectiveness, but also the environmental impact of extracting and refining the metal. The authors examine the environmental impacts of implementing a select group of methanation catalysts in the field for industrial scale synthetic natural gas production using the analytical hierarchy process (AHP). Catalysts containing a combination of rare earth metals are investigated separately and AHP is used to rank the catalysts based on their environmental impact per kg of CO2 converted. It is determined that catalysts containing common metals, such as nickel, have the lowest environmental impact per conversion rate across a number of metrics and represented the catalysts with the second and third highest conversion rates analyzed. Catalysts containing ruthenium are found to be the most detrimental to the environment, in spite of the favorable conversion rate offered by a ruthenium-cesium catalyst in methanation reactors.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available