4.7 Article

An effective approach for the dual-resource flexible job shop scheduling problem considering loading and unloading

Journal

JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT MANUFACTURING
Volume 32, Issue 3, Pages 707-728

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10845-020-01697-5

Keywords

Flexible job shop scheduling problem; Fixture; Resource requirement similarity; Set-up time; Improved NSGA-II

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51305024]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper studies the dual resource constrained flexible job shop scheduling problem and proposes a similarity-based scheduling algorithm for setup-time reduction. Experimental results show that scheduling solutions with multiple resources have a greater guiding effect on production.
Many manufacturing systems need more than one type of resource to co-work with. Commonly studied flexible job shop scheduling problems merely consider the main resource such as machines and ignore the impact of other types of resource. As a result, scheduling solutions may not put into practice. This paper therefore studies the dual resource constrained flexible job shop scheduling problem when loading and unloading time (DRFJSP-LU) of the fixtures is considered. It formulates a multi-objective mathematical model to jointly minimize the makespan and the total setup time. Considering the influence of resource requirement similarity among different operations, we propose a similarity-based scheduling algorithm for setup-time reduction (SSA4STR) and then an improved non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm II (NSGA-II) to optimize the DRFJSP-LU. Experimental results show that the SSA4STR can effectively reduce the loading and unloading time of fixtures while ensuring a level of makespan. The experiments also verify that the scheduling solution with multiple resources has a greater guiding effect on production than the scheduling result with a single resource.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available