4.2 Article

Analysis of second mesiobuccal root canal instrumentation in maxillary first molars with three nickel-titanium rotary instruments: a micro-computed tomographic study

Journal

ODONTOLOGY
Volume 109, Issue 2, Pages 496-505

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10266-020-00564-2

Keywords

Maxillary first molar; Second mesiobuccal root canal; Micro-computed tomography; Shaping ability

Funding

  1. Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions [PAPD_2018-87]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province [BK_20191347]
  3. General Project of the Science and Technology Development Fund of Nanjing Medical University [NMUB2018168]
  4. Natural Science Foundation of Nanjing [201803045]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, the shaping characteristics of three nickel-titanium systems in second mesiobuccal (MB2) canal instrumentation were evaluated using micro-computed tomographic imaging. The results showed that Hero Shaper (HS) and Hyflex CM (HCM) with a 0.04 taper are safer than Protaper Universal (PTU) for MB2 canal instrumentation.
The aim of this study was to evaluate the shaping characteristics of Protaper Universal (PTU; Dentsply Tulsa Dental Specialties, Johnson City, TN), Hero Shaper (HS; MicroMega, Besacon, France) and Hyflex CM (HCM; Coltene-Whaledent, Allstetten, Switzerland) nickel-titanium systems with various apical sizes and tapers in second mesiobuccal (MB2) canal instrumentation using micro-computed tomographic imaging. A total of 27 maxillary first molars with independent patent MB2 canals were selected and randomly assigned to three groups according to the 3-dimensional morphologic aspects obtained from preoperative micro-computed tomographic scans. Canals were first negotiated with a size 8 K-file and finally prepared to F1, F2, and F3 with PTU and to sizes 20.04 taper, 25.04 taper, and 30.04 taper with HS and HCM. Postoperative scans were performed after each instrumentation with the same parameters used in the initial scan. The canal volume, canal transportation, untouched canal surface and wall thickness were measured and calculated using Mimics 10.01 software (Image Works, Materialise, Belgium). Statistical analysis was performed using one-way analysis of variance post hoc LSD tests. PTU removed more dentin than HS and HCM in all sections when instrumented to the same apical size (P < 0.05). HS and HCM presented a lower mean value of canal transportation than PTU in all measured sizes and sections. PTU presented a lower mean value of distal wall thickness than HS and HCM at the level of 1 and 2 mm below the furcation region in all measured sizes. In conclusion, for MB2 canal instrumentation, HS and HCM of 0.04 taper are safer than PTU.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available