3.9 Review

Dual identities for various alcohols in two different yeasts

Journal

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/21501203.2020.1837976

Keywords

Quorum sensing; Candida albicans; saccharomyces cerevisiae; biofilms; fusel alcohols; alcohol dehydrogenase

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Based on the translation provided above, the summary discusses the regulation of quorum sensing and signaling molecules in yeast, the impact of these signals on morphogenesis, and the hypothesis of competitive advantage in microorganisms.
Most of the yeast bypasses the developmental stage from simple unicellular yeast to elongated structure like hyphae. Regulation of this transition is governed by various quorum sensing and signalling molecules produced under different conditions of growth, that differ significantly, both physiologically and chemically. The evidence of fungal quorum sensing was uncovered ten years ago after the discovery of farnesol as first eukaryotic quorum sensing molecules in Candida albicans. In addition to farnesol, tyrosol was identified as second quorum sensing molecules in C. albicans controlling physiological activities. After the discovery of farnesol and tyrosol, regulation of morphogenesis through the production of chemical signalling molecules such as isoamyl alcohol, 2-phenylethyl alcohol, 1-dodecanol, E-nerolidol, etc. is reported in C. albicans. Some of the evidence suggests that the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae exhibits this type of regulation and the signals are regulated by aromatic alcohols which are the end product of amino acid metabolism. The effects of these molecules on morphogenesis are not similar in both yeasts, making comparisons hard. It is hypothesized that these signals works in microorganisms to derive a competitive advantage. Here, we present an example for utilization of competitive strategy by C. albicans and S. cerevisiae over other microorganisms.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.9
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available