4.1 Review

Vulnerable learners in the age of COVID-19: A scoping review

Journal

AUSTRALIAN EDUCATIONAL RESEARCHER
Volume 48, Issue 4, Pages 585-604

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s13384-020-00409-5

Keywords

COVID-19 pandemic; Education; Vulnerable young people; Disadvantage; Scoping review

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This scoping review discusses COVID-19 approaches to managing unanticipated school closures and literature related to young people learning outside of school, highlighting educational issues and psychosocial consequences. While some countries opted for mass school shutdowns, others kept open schools for disadvantaged students, providing them with a safe learning environment. In Australia, full school closures could lead to persistent disadvantages for vulnerable students through various barriers.
This scoping review provides an overview of COVID-19 approaches to managing unanticipated school closures and available literature related to young people learning outside-of-school. A range of material has been drawn upon to highlight educational issues of this learning context, including psychosocial and emotional repercussions. Globally, while some countries opted for a mass school shut-down, many schools remained open for students from disadvantaged backgrounds. This partial closure not only enabled learning in smaller targeted groups but also offered a safe sanctuary for those who needed a regulated and secure environment. In Australia, if full school closures were to be enforced over a long period, a significant proportion of students from more vulnerable backgrounds would likely experience persistent disadvantage through a range of barriers: long-term educational disengagement, digital exclusion, poor technology management, and increased psychosocial challenges. This scoping review combines research on technology availability and learning, with analysis of the long-term educational impacts of navigating the COVID-19 disruption.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available