4.5 Article

From Attention to Action: The Influence of Cognitive and Ideological Diversity in Top Management Teams on Business Model Innovation

Journal

JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT STUDIES
Volume 58, Issue 8, Pages 2082-2110

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/joms.12668

Keywords

business models; cognition; conservatism‐ liberalism; executive leaders; team longevity; values

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Cognitive and ideological diversity in TMTs positively affect business model innovation (BMI), but too much ideological diversity has a negative effect. TMT diversity enhances both the attention scope and intensity of BMI, while TMT longevity can amplify the benefits of diversity.
As top management teams (TMTs) become progressively more diverse, an important question arises: how does greater TMT diversity affect a company's ability to innovate its business model? To examine this, we draw on the upper-echelons literature and on research on business models as activity systems to theorize that cognitive and ideological diversity in TMTs will affect teams' attention to business model innovation (BMI) and companies' BMI intensity. Analysis of longitudinal data from firms in the US printing and publishing industry provides support for the theory that, over time, TMT cognitive and ideological diversity have a positive influence on BMI. Whereas cognitive diversity expands TMT's BMI attention-scope, both cognitive and ideological diversity increase BMI intensity. However, too much ideological diversity has a negative effect. We furthermore find that TMT longevity moderates the effects of TMT diversity positively, suggesting that the benefit of diversity grows as team members work together longer as a team. We discuss the study's contributions to the literature on diversity, BMI, and the upper echelons.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available