4.7 Article

Examining antecedents of consumers' pro-environmental behaviours: TPB extended with materialism and innovativeness

Journal

JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH
Volume 122, Issue -, Pages 685-699

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.01.017

Keywords

Pro-environmental behaviour; Theory of planned behaviour; Materialism; Innovativeness; Age; Saudi Arabia

Categories

Funding

  1. Umm Al-Qura University

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found that consumers' intentions to adopt pro-environmental behaviors are influenced by innovativeness, materialism, perceived consumer effectiveness, and environmental concern, while social influence does not play a significant role. Additionally, differences in intentions between younger and older respondents were identified.
Major environmental issues facing our planet are considered to be partly rooted in consumer overconsumption that has resulted from high economic growth. Pro-environmental behaviours (PEBs) have been studied extensively in developed Western countries but more research is needed in developing non-Western countries. Additionally, there are increasing calls for research providing broader theoretical and behavioural explanations of consumers' intentions to adopt PEBs. Therefore, the aim of this research was to examine the factors affecting consumers' PEBs in Saudi Arabia. Quantitative data (n = 613) were collected using a survey method. The proposed conceptual model and associated hypotheses were tested using structural equation modelling. The results revealed that consumers' intentions to adopt direct- and indirect-PEBs are affected by innovativeness, materialism, perceived consumer effectiveness, and environmental concern, but not by social influence. Evidence was also found of differences between younger and older respondents. These findings can be used to formulate effective marketing strategies to benefit the environment, society, and sustainable companies in the country.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available