4.2 Review

An immunogenetic view of COVID-19

Journal

GENETICS AND MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
Volume 44, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

SOC BRASIL GENETICA
DOI: 10.1590/1678-4685-GMB-2021-0036

Keywords

Immunogenetics; COVID-19; SARS-CoV-2; HLA; KIR

Funding

  1. United States National Institutes of Health [NIH R01 GM075091]
  2. Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico [CNPq 308783/2019-0]
  3. United States National Institutes of Health (NIH) [1R01NS102153]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Meeting the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic requires an interdisciplinary approach that integrates knowledge of immune function and genetic variation. Immune genetics can help explain the different responses to viral infection and disease progression. Understanding the role of genes like HLA and KIR in COVID-19 is crucial for advancing our knowledge of the disease.
Meeting the challenges brought by the COVID-19 pandemic requires an interdisciplinary approach. In this context, integrating knowledge of immune function with an understanding of how genetic variation influences the nature of immunity is a key challenge. Immunogenetics can help explain the heterogeneity of susceptibility and protection to the viral infection and disease progression. Here, we review the knowledge developed so far, discussing fundamental genes for triggering the innate and adaptive immune responses associated with a viral infection, especially with the SARS-CoV-2 mechanisms. We emphasize the role of the HLA and KIR genes, discussing what has been uncovered about their role in COVID-19 and addressing methodological challenges of studying these genes. Finally, we comment on questions that arise when studying admixed populations, highlighting the case of Brazil. We argue that the interplay between immunology and an understanding of genetic associations can provide an important contribution to our knowledge of COVID-19.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available