4.7 Article

Analysis of Propagation Delay Effects on Bearings-Only Fusion of Heterogeneous Sensors

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SIGNAL PROCESSING
Volume 69, Issue -, Pages 6488-6503

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TSP.2021.3129599

Keywords

Propagation delay; Sensors; Maximum likelihood estimation; Target tracking; Delays; Sensor fusion; Radar tracking; Bearings-only TMA; heterogeneous sensors; passive sensor fusion; propagation delay; maximum likelihood estimator; performance analysis

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The paper explores the impact of neglecting signal propagation delay on the performance of a maximum likelihood estimator in bearings-only fusion with heterogeneous sensors. The analysis and simulation results indicate that neglecting propagation delay leads to performance degradation, and a bias-compensated MLE approach is proposed to improve performance towards the lower bound.
In bearings-only tracking applications, the standard bearing model ignores the propagation delay of signal, except in cases where the target speed is comparable to the signal speed. This paper provides a theoretical analysis of the performance degradation suffered by a maximum likelihood estimator (MLE) that neglects the signal propagation delay in the bearings-only fusion of heterogeneous sensors: one with negligible propagation delay and the other with non-negligible delay. By using a higher order Taylor-series based analysis, we derive approximate expressions for the bias and mean square error (MSE) of the MLE. The analysis shows that neglecting the propagation delay of a sensor (with non-negligible delay) in such bearings-only fusion problems leads to severe degradation in performance even when the signal speed is orders of magnitude higher than that of target. Simulation results confirm the validity of the theoretical predictions. Finally, a bias-compensated MLE is proposed that not only takes into account the propagation delay, but also compensates for the estimation bias. This bias-compensated MLE is nearly unbiased and exhibits an RMS error performance close to the Cramer Rao lower bound.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available