4.7 Article

Antecedents and consequences of business model innovation in the IT industry

Journal

JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH
Volume 123, Issue -, Pages 389-400

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.10.003

Keywords

Business model innovation; Firm performance; Absorptive capacity; Agility; Top management mindfulness

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study finds that knowledge absorptive capacity, agility, and top management mindfulness significantly influence business model innovation, which in turn acts as a mediator between these factors and business performance. Organizations need to focus on these antecedents to make necessary changes to their business models in order to enhance their competitive advantage and firm performance.
Business model innovation has gained increasing attention from scholars in the last few years. However, there is a lack of large-scale empirical research on business model innovation and fewer attempts have been made to study whether and how various factors can affect innovation in business models. As a consequence, this study aims to investigate the impact of knowledge absorptive capacity, organizational agility, and top management mindfulness on business model innovation as these factors contribute to organizational changes in business models. Data were collected from IT firms operating in Pakistan. The results indicate that business model innovation is significantly dependent on the knowledge absorptive capacity, agility, and mindfulness of the top management. Furthermore, business model innovation was established as a mediator in the relationship between these factors and business performance. From a managerial perspective, the findings are significant as organizations need to focus on the antecedents to make the necessary change to their business models to improve their competitive advantage and firm performance.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available