4.7 Article

Binary population synthesis with probabilistic remnant mass and kick prescriptions

Journal

MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 500, Issue 1, Pages 1380-1384

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/staa3390

Keywords

gravitational waves; binaries: general; stars: black holes; stars: neutron; supernovae: general; X-rays: binaries

Funding

  1. Australian Research Council [FT190100574]
  2. European Union (ERC) [715063]
  3. Dutch Research Council or NWO (Vidi) [639.042.728]
  4. Australian Research Council [FT190100574] Funding Source: Australian Research Council

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The probabilistic prescription for compact remnant masses and kicks significantly impacts massive binary population synthesis, filling the mass gap between neutron stars and black holes with low-mass black holes, but also leading to inconsistencies with the observed sample.
We report on the impact of a probabilistic prescription for compact remnant masses and kicks on massive binary population synthesis. We find that this prescription populates the putative mass gap between neutron stars and black holes with low-mass black holes. However, evolutionary effects reduce the number of X-ray binary candidates with low-mass black holes, consistent with the dearth of such systems in the observed sample. We further find that this prescription is consistent with the formation of heavier binary neutron stars such as GW190425, but overpredicts the masses of Galactic double neutron stars. The revised natal kicks, particularly increased ultra-stripped supernova kicks, do not directly explain the observed Galactic double neutron star orbital period-eccentricity distribution. Finally, this prescription allows for the formation of systems similar to the recently discovered extreme mass ratio binary GW190814, but only if we allow for the survival of binaries in which the common envelope is initiated by a donor crossing the Hertzsprung gap, contrary to our standard model.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available