4.8 Article

Interaction of Chlorella vulgaris and bacteria when co-cultivated in anaerobically digested swine manure

Journal

BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY
Volume 320, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.actatropica.2020.124250

Keywords

Chlorella vulgaris; Activated sludge; Co-cultivation; Relationship and interaction; Wastewater treatment

Funding

  1. Minnesota Environmental and Natural Resources Trust Fund [CON000000055335]
  2. University of Minnesota Center for Biorefining

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this research, the co-culture of algae and bacteria on anaerobically digested swine manure was investigated. The results showed that the biomass growth was promoted in the co-cultivation group compared with the algae-only culture. Observations indicated that the presence of bacteria enhanced settling rate through the formation of algal consortium flocs.
Mono-culture and co-culture of algae (Chlorella vulgaris) and bacteria (activated sludge) on anaerobically digested swine manure (ADSM) were investigated in this research. The results showed that during the co cultivation biomass growth was promoted (2.43 +/- 0.11 g/L) compared with the algae-only culture (1.09 +/- 0.03 g/L), and the aerobic bacteria growth was initially promoted, then inhibited. The SEM (Scanning Electron Microscope) observation indicated that the amount of the C. vulgaris increased while bacteria 'disappeared' over time. After 30 min settlement, 95.5% of the biomass in co-cultivation group precipitated, while only 40.4% of the biomass settled for the algae-only group was. It is believed that the presence of bacteria enhanced the settling rate through the formation of algal consortium flocs. Bacterial community diversity and composition were measured and the results indicated that the bacterial diversity dropped and the bacterial active classes changed in the co-cultivation group.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available