4.2 Article

Erosive Vulvar Lichen Planus and Risk of Vulvar Neoplasia

Journal

JOURNAL OF LOWER GENITAL TRACT DISEASE
Volume 25, Issue 1, Pages 71-75

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/LGT.0000000000000581

Keywords

vulva; lichen planus; vulvar cancer; HSIL

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study found that the risk of premalignant/malignant transformation in women with vulvar lichen planus is low, with close surveillance and compliance with treatment being crucial. Biopsies should be conducted promptly when suspicious lesions appear during follow-up.
Objective The aim of the study was to assess the risk of vulvar cancer and precursors in a cohort of women with vulvar lichen planus (LP) and the clinical and therapeutic features of these patients. Materials and Methods A retrospective cohort study, including all the women with the diagnosis of vulvar LP, followed in one institution during a period of 11 years, was performed. Demographic and clinical data, as well as treatment, follow-up, and histology results, were evaluated. Results A total of 127 women were diagnosed with vulvar LP. The mean follow-up time was 3.9 +/- 0.5 years (range = 1-11 years). Ultrapotent topical corticosteroids were first-line treatment in 91.8% (n = 112), with 32 cases (25.2%) needing an alternative treatment. Overall, 30 biopsies were performed in 19 women (15%). Vulvar high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion was diagnosed in 3 women (2.4%), 2 (1.6%) of whom were later diagnosed with vulvar squamous cell carcinoma. No cases of differentiated vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia were observed. Conclusions Premalignant/malignant transformation in women with vulvar LP under surveillance and compliant with treatment is low. A close follow-up seems to be crucial to prevent future malignancy. Biopsies should be performed whenever a suspicious lesion seems during follow-up.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available