4.3 Review

A Systematic Search and Review of Questionnaires Measuring Individual psychosocial Factors Predicting Return to Work After Musculoskeletal and Common Mental Disorders

Journal

JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL REHABILITATION
Volume 31, Issue 3, Pages 491-511

Publisher

SPRINGER/PLENUM PUBLISHERS
DOI: 10.1007/s10926-020-09935-6

Keywords

Return to work; Psychosocial factors; Measurement tools; Common mental disorders; Musculoskeletal disorders

Funding

  1. Universita degli Studi di Milano - Bicocca within the CRUI-CARE Agreement

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Individual psychosocial factors play a crucial role in the return to work process for workers with musculoskeletal disorders and common mental disorders. Through a systematic search, researchers identified predictors of successful return to work, including work expectations, self-efficacy, work ability, work involvement, health-job connection, optimism, and pessimism. While some tools used to measure these factors show potential for improvement, there are also several excellent options available.
Purpose Individual psychosocial factors are crucial in the return to work (RTW) process of workers with musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs) and common mental disorders (CMDs). However, the quality and validity of the questionnaires used to measure these factors have rarely been investigated. The present systematic search and literature review aims at identifying, categorizing, and evaluating the questionnaires (measurement tools) used to measure individual psychosocial factors related to the perception of the personal condition and motivation to RTW that are predictive of successful RTW among workers with MSDs or CMDs. Methods Through a systematic search on PubMed, Web of Science, and PsycINFO library databases and grey literature, we identified the individual psychosocial factors predictive of successful RTW among these workers. Then, we retrieved the questionnaires used to measure these factors. Finally, we searched for articles validating these questionnaires to describe them exhaustively from a psychometric and practical point of view. Results: The review included 76 studies from an initial pool of 2263 articles. Three common significant predictors of RTW after MSDs and CMDs emerged (i.e., RTW expectations, RTW self-efficacy, and work ability), two significant predictors of RTW after MSDs only (i.e., work involvement and the self-perceived connection between health and job), and two significant predictors of RTW after CMDs only (i.e., optimism and pessimism). We analyzed 30 questionnaires, including eight multiple-item scales and 22 single-item measures. Based on their psychometric and practical properties, we evaluated one of the eight multiple-item scales as questionable and five as excellent. Conclusions: With some exceptions (i.e., self-efficacy), the tools used to measure individual psychosocial factors show moderate to considerable room for improvement.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available