4.7 Article

US transportation infrastructure resilience: Influences of insurance, incentives, and public assistance

Journal

TRANSPORT POLICY
Volume 100, Issue -, Pages 108-119

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2020.10.011

Keywords

Infrastructure resilience; Insurance; Public assistance; Transportation

Funding

  1. Critical Infrastructure Resilience Institute (CIRI), a U.S. Department of Homeland Security Center of Excellence

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article discusses the high dependence of the U.S. economy and way of life on transportation systems, as well as the significant social and economic impacts that can result from disruptions to transportation networks due to various hazards and infrastructure issues. Through qualitative and quantitative analyses and in-depth review of literature, barriers to and opportunities for reducing transportation-related disaster losses and improving infrastructure risk management are identified, with recommendations for policy measures to enhance transportation infrastructure resilience.
The U.S. economy and way of life are highly dependent on transportation systems, which move goods and people locally, regionally, nationally, and internationally. Major disruptions to transportation networks due to natural hazards, manmade hazards (notably terrorist and cyberattacks), accidents, or infrastructure failure can cause substantial social and economic impacts. Through qualitative and quantitative analyses, including an in-depth review of the literature and semi-structured interviews, we identify barriers to and opportunities for lowering transportation-related disaster losses and for improving infrastructure risk management including the need for better data and metrics to support resilience. Our analyses are supported by a review of transportation-related Public Assistance (PA) expenditures to understand the magnitude and variation of expenditures over time. PA is a U.S. Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) program dedicated to partial reimbursement of hazardrelated losses for public infrastructure. Our analyses show that the availability and significant outlays of PA after disasters inhibit risk-based loss reduction actions by infrastructure managers. Risk management tools, notably insurance and mitigation measures, can efficiently reduce disaster losses and speed recovery times. This paper concludes with recommendations for policy measures to facilitate improvements in transportation infrastructure resilience.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available