4.5 Article

An online headphone screening test based on dichotic pitch

Journal

BEHAVIOR RESEARCH METHODS
Volume 53, Issue 4, Pages 1551-1562

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.3758/s13428-020-01514-0

Keywords

Auditory online experiments; Web-based testing; Crowd-sourcing; Audition; Psychophysics

Funding

  1. BBSRC [BB/P003745/1]
  2. Wellcome Trust [091681, 213686/Z/18/Z]
  3. NIHR UCLH BRC Deafness and Hearing Problems Theme
  4. ERC [771550-SOUNDSCENE]
  5. NIH [R01 DC005216, R01 DC012262]
  6. Wellcome Trust [213686/Z/18/Z] Funding Source: Wellcome Trust
  7. BBSRC [BB/P003745/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Online experimental platforms can be an alternative or complement to lab-based research, but limited control over participants' listening environment is a concern. Headphones offer better sound control and noise shielding, and a new HP test shows promise for detecting headphone users with high selectivity. Combining tests can further lower false-positive rates, particularly beneficial for critical headphone use cases.
Online experimental platforms can be used as an alternative to, or complement, lab-based research. However, when conducting auditory experiments via online methods, the researcher has limited control over the participants' listening environment. We offer a new method to probe one aspect of that environment, headphone use. Headphones not only provide better control of sound presentation but can also shield the listener from background noise. Here we present a rapid (< 3 min) headphone screening test based on Huggins Pitch (HP), a perceptual phenomenon that can only be detected when stimuli are presented dichotically. We validate this test using a cohort of Trusted online participants who completed the test using both headphones and loudspeakers. The same participants were also used to test an existing headphone test (AP test; Woods et al., 2017, Attention Perception Psychophysics). We demonstrate that compared to the AP test, the HP test has a higher selectivity for headphone users, rendering it as a compelling alternative to existing methods. Overall, the new HP test correctly detects 80% of headphone users and has a false-positive rate of 20%. Moreover, we demonstrate that combining the HP test with an additional test-either the AP test or an alternative based on a beat test (BT)-can lower the false-positive rate to similar to 7%. This should be useful in situations where headphone use is particularly critical (e.g., dichotic or spatial manipulations). Code for implementing the new tests is publicly available in JavaScript and through Gorilla (gorilla.sc).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available