4.7 Article

Effect of long-term beta-blocker treatment following myocardial infarction among stable, optimally treated patients without heart failure in the reperfusion era: a Danish, nationwide cohort study

Journal

EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL
Volume 42, Issue 9, Pages 907-914

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa1058

Keywords

Myocardial infarction; Beta-blockers; Reperfusion era; Over-treatment; PCI

Funding

  1. Ib Mogens Kristiansens Almene Fond [30206-383]
  2. Helsefonden [20-B-0035]
  3. Snedkermester Sophus Jacobsen og hustru Astrid Jacobsen Fond [J 167/1]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study found no long-term effect of beta-blocker (BB) treatment on cardiovascular prognosis in stable, optimally treated myocardial infarction (MI) patients without heart failure (HF) from 3 months to 3 years after MI admission.
Aims We aimed to investigate the long-term cardio-protective effect associated with beta-blocker (BB) treatment in stable, optimally treated myocardial infarction (MI) patients without heart failure (HF) Methods and results Using nationwide registries, we included patients with first-time MI undergoing coronary angiography (CAG) or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) during admission and treated with both acetyl-salicylic acid and statins post-discharge between 2003 and 2018. Patients with prior history of MI, prior BB use, or any alternative indication or contraindication for BB treatment were excluded. Follow-up began 3 months following discharge in patients alive, free of cardiovascular (CV) events or procedures. Primary outcomes were CV death, recurrent MI, and a composite outcome of CV events. We used adjusted logistic regression and reported standardized absolute risks and differences (ARD) 3 years after MI. Overall, 30 177 stable, optimally treated MI patients were included (58% acute PCI, 26% sub-acute PCI, 16% CAG without intervention). At baseline, 82% of patients were on BB treatment (median age 61 years, 75% male) and 18% were not (median age 62 years, 68% male). BB treatment was associated with a similar risk of CV death, recurrent MI, and the composite outcome of CV events compared with no BB treatment [ARD (95% confidence intervals)] correspondingly; 0.1% (-0.3% to 0.5%), 0.2% (-0.7% to 1.2%), and 1.2% (-0.2% to 2.7%) Conclusions In this nationwide cohort study of stable, optimally treated MI patients without HF, we found no long-term effect of BB treatment on CV prognosis following the patients from 3 months to 3 years after MI admission.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available