4.3 Article

Intimate Partner Homicide Risk Assessment by Police in Spain: The Dual Protocol VPR5.0-H

Journal

PSYCHOSOCIAL INTERVENTION
Volume 30, Issue 1, Pages 47-55

Publisher

COLEGIO OFICIAL PSICOLOGOS MADRID
DOI: 10.5093/pi2020a16

Keywords

Homicide; Intimate partner homicide; Violence risk assessment; Police risk assessment; VioGen System

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Spanish police extensively use IPV risk assessment in daily operations, with a focus on improving predictability of intimate partner homicides. The evolution of the VPR5.0 tool aimed at refining IPV predictors was studied using a sample of 2,159 records, showing significant relationships between 13 risk factors and IPH. Binary logistic regression identified six significant factors that accurately classified 86.3% of IPH cases. The new H-Scale performance parameters were comparable to previous studies, with good sensitivity and specificity.
Spanish police makes an extensive use of intimate partner violence (IPV) risk assessment on a daily basis. Improved prediction procedures have encouraged the search for greater refinement of IPV predictors by adjusting to specific targets, such as lethal outcomes or potential victimization of children. This paper describes the evolution of the VPR5.0 tool (VioGen System Police Risk Assessment) as an algorithm aimed at improving predictability of intimate partner homicides (IPH). A sample of 2,159 records was used, 159 of whom were IPH victims. The sample was divided into two comparable groups of cases (IPH) and controls (N-IPH) to validate the results. The results showed that 13 out of 35 risk factors were significantly related to IPH with an effect size different to that of general N-IPH (with OR values ranging between 1.507 and 8.087). Binary logistic regression showed six significant factors that correctly classified 86.3% of the IPH. The new H-Scale performance parameters were comparable to those obtained in studies with the same objective (sensitivity 84%, specificity 60%, OR = 8.130, AUC = .80. PPV = .19 and NPV = .97).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available