4.5 Article

A redundant hydraulic function of root hairs in barley plants grown in hydroponics

Journal

FUNCTIONAL PLANT BIOLOGY
Volume 48, Issue 4, Pages 448-459

Publisher

CSIRO PUBLISHING
DOI: 10.1071/FP20287

Keywords

barley; brb mutant; endodermis; Hordeum vulgare L; hydraulic conductivity; mineral nutrition; N deficiency; P deficiency; root hair

Categories

Funding

  1. Erasmus internship funding

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Root hairs did not affect the overall hydraulic response of barley plants to nutritional treatments, but the formation of apoplastic barriers was consistently reduced in brb plants. The hydraulic function of root hairs may be redundant in barley under the tested hydroponic conditions.
The root hair-less brb of Hordeum vulgare L. (bald root barley) mutant was used to assess the significance that root hairs have for the hydraulic properties of roots and response to a limited supply of mineral nutrients in plants grown on hydroponics. The barley brb mutant and its parent wild-type (H. vulgare cv. Pallas) were grown under nutrient sufficient control conditions, and under conditions of low supply of P and N. Plants were analysed when they were 14-18 days old. Root hydraulic conductivity (Lp) was determined for excised root systems and intact transpiring plants, and cell Lp was determined through cell pressure probe measurements. The formation of Casparian bands and suberin lamellae was followed through staining of cross-sections. The presence or absence of root hairs had no effect on the overall hydraulic response of plants to nutritional treatments. Root and cell Lp did not differ between the two genotypes. The most apparent difference between brb and wild-type plants was the consistently reduced formation of apoplastic barriers in brb plants. Any hydraulic function of root hairs can be redundant in barley, at least under the hydroponic conditions tested.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available