4.3 Article

Dacomitinib and gedatolisib in combination with fractionated radiation in head and neck cancer

Journal

CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL RADIATION ONCOLOGY
Volume 26, Issue -, Pages 15-23

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2020.11.003

Keywords

Head and neck cancer; Radiation; Targeted agents; Xenografts; Growth delay

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study found that combining two drugs with radiation did not provide additional benefits in the treatment of head and neck cancer. Dacomitinib may warrant further investigation as a radiation sensitizing agent.
Background and purpose: There has been little success targeting individual genes in combination with radiation in head and neck cancer. In this study we investigated whether targeting two key pathways simultaneously might be more effective. Materials and methods: We studied the effect of combining dacomitinib (pan-HER, irreversible inhibitor) and gedatolisib (dual PI3K/MTOR inhibitor) with radiation in well characterized, low passage xenograft models of HNSCC in vitro and in vivo. Results: Dacomitinib showed differential growth inhibition in vitro that correlated to EGFR expression whilst gedatolisib was effective in both cell lines. Neither agent radiosensitized the cell lines in vitro. In vivo studies demonstrated that dacomitinib was an effective agent alone and in combination with radiation whilst the addition of gedatolisib did not enhance the effect of these two modalities despite inhibiting phosphorylation of key genes in the PI3K/MTOR pathway. Conclusions: Our results showed that combining two drugs with radiation provided no added benefit compared to the single most active drug. Dacomitinib deserves more investigation as a radiation sensitizing agent in HNSCC. (C) 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available