4.1 Article

Framing work and welfare: Insights from the growing relevance of company welfare in Italy

Journal

JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS
Volume 63, Issue 2, Pages 235-262

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/0022185620973685

Keywords

Employee benefits; employment relations; industrial relations theory; labour– management cooperation; welfare system

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article applies the concept of frames of reference to analyze the growing relevance of company welfare in Italy after the 2008 crisis, divided into three phases of development. It discusses the impact of company welfare on trade unions and government policies, highlighting contrasting ideologies and pragmatic solutions. The importance of political and economic mobilization in driving company welfare, as well as the resulting social and economic imbalances, is also emphasized.
This article applies the concept of frames of reference to contemporary work and welfare dynamics by focusing on the growing relevance of company welfare in Italy after the 2008 crisis. The analysis considers how this occurred along three phases: in the first, a path-breaking case, Luxottica, demonstrates the potential of company welfare; then, Renzi's government promotes company welfare through tax breaks; finally, trade unions try to affect the diffusion of company welfare, displaying contrasting ideologies as well as pragmatic joint solutions in the process. Overall, two contiguous sub-frames - consultative unitarism and collaborative pluralism - offer the mainstream justification to the events and the policy debate around them, a debate in which the industrial relations scholarship played a key role. However, a critical interpretation is present too, suggesting that the relevance of company welfare is driven by the mobilisation of a political and economic elite and results in few cases of positive employment relations alongside broad social and economic imbalances.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available