Journal
JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY
Volume 32, Issue 1, Pages -Publisher
KOREAN SOC GYNECOLOGY ONCOLOGY & COLPOSCOPY
DOI: 10.3802/jgo.2021.32.e9
Keywords
Chemotherapy; Ovarian Neoplasms; Doxorubicin; Recurrence
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
This study compared the efficacy of 40mg/m2 and 50mg/m2 pegylated liposomal doxorubicin in treating platinum-resistant ovarian carcinoma patients, and found no significant difference in PFS and OS between the two doses. However, the standard dose group experienced more hematologic toxicity and oral cavity mucositis.
Objective: The standard dose for pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) is 50 mg/m 2 every 4 weeks. While 40 mg/m 2 has recently been used in clinical practice, evidence supporting this use remains lacking. Methods: This phase III randomized, non-inferiority study compared progression-free survival (PFS) for patients with platinum-resistant ovarian carcinoma between an experimental arm (40 mg/m(2) PLD) and a standard arm (50 mg/m(2) PLD) until 10 courses, disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Eligible patients had received <= 2 prior lines. Stratification was by performance status and PFS of prior chemotherapy (<3 months versus >= 3 months). The primary endpoint was PFS and secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS), toxicity profile, clinical response and tolerability. The total number of patients was 470. Results: The trial was prematurely closed due to slow recruitment, with 272 patients randomized to the experimental arm (n=137) and standard arm (n=135). Final analysis was performed with 234 deaths and 269 events for PFS. In the experimental arm vs. standard arm, median PFS was 4.0 months vs. 4.0 months (hazard ratio [HR)=1.065; 95% confidence interval [CI)=0.830-1.366) and median OS was 14.0 months vs. 14.0 months (HR=1.078; 95% CI=0.831-1.397). Hematologic toxicity and oral cavity mucositis (>= grade 2) were more frequent in the standard arm than in the experimental arm, but no difference was seen in >= grade 2 hand-foot skin reaction. Conclusion: Non-inferiority of 2 PLD dosing schedule was not confirmed because the trial was closed prematurely. However, recommendation of dose reduction of PLD should be based both on efficacy and safety.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available