4.4 Article

Pornography Use and Psychological Science: A Call for Consideration

Journal

CURRENT DIRECTIONS IN PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE
Volume 30, Issue 1, Pages 68-75

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/0963721420979594

Keywords

pornography; compulsive sexual behavior; sexually explicit media; media effects; technology

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Pornography use is prevalent and controversial in developed nations. Research suggests that it plays a significant role in various domains within psychological science, including relationship research, adolescent development research, and clinical science. The effects of pornography use can range from positive to neutral to negative, highlighting its complex nature and importance in psychological research.
Pornography use is both ubiquitous and controversial in developed nations. Although research related to pornography use has flourished in topical and special-interest journals for several decades, much of this work has remained in the periphery of mainstream interests. The current article reviews how pornography use is likely relevant to various domains within psychological science, particularly emphasizing its significance in relationship research, adolescent-development research, and clinical science. Specifically, pornography use is likely salient to research examining both sexual and romantic satisfaction. Additionally, it is also likely relevant to understanding adolescent sexual development, particularly among sexual-minority populations. Finally, a large body of research suggests that pornography use may become problematic, either because of excessive use or moral incongruence about such use, illustrating its salience in clinical psychological science. Collectively, the current research related to pornography use suggests that it is of interest to multiple domains in psychological science and that its effects can range from positive to neutral to negative.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available