4.4 Article

Alternate primers for whole-genome SARS-CoV-2 sequencing

Journal

VIRUS EVOLUTION
Volume 7, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/ve/veab006

Keywords

SARS-CoV-2; COVID-19; primers; next generation sequencing

Categories

Funding

  1. Uganda Ministry of Health
  2. National COVID-19 Task Force
  3. UK MRC
  4. UK DFID
  5. European Union
  6. UK Research and Innovation/MRC
  7. Global Fund
  8. Government of Uganda
  9. GAVI
  10. Islamic Development Bank
  11. UK MRC
  12. World Health Organization
  13. US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
  14. Jack Ma Foundation
  15. Marie Sklodowska-Curie Individual Fellowship - European Union
  16. Wellcome Epidemic Preparedness-Coronavirus grant - Wellcome Trust
  17. [799417]
  18. [NC_PC_19060]
  19. [220977/Z/20/Z]
  20. [MC_EX_MR/L016273/1]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Global efforts to sequence the SARS-CoV-2 genome are hindered by gaps in approximately 19 to 43 per cent of monthly generated sequences. This study provides an alternative primer set and sequencing scheme to improve the quality and coverage of genomes, aiding in the development of effective control measures.
As the world is struggling to control the novel Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), there is an urgency to develop effective control measures. Essential information is encoded in the virus genome sequence with accurate and complete SARS-CoV-2 sequences essential for tracking the movement and evolution of the virus and for guiding efforts to develop vaccines and antiviral drugs. While there is unprecedented SARS-CoV-2 sequencing efforts globally, approximately 19 to 43 per cent of the genomes generated monthly are gapped, reducing their information content. The current study documents the genome gap frequencies and their positions in the currently available data and provides an alternative primer set and a sequencing scheme to help improve the quality and coverage of the genomes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available