4.5 Article

Factors Affecting the Outcomes of Patients with Malignant Rhabdoid Tumors: A Population-Based Study

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES
Volume 18, Issue 4, Pages 911-920

Publisher

IVYSPRING INT PUBL
DOI: 10.7150/ijms.51186

Keywords

Malignant rhabdoid tumor; SEER; Risk factors; Epidemiology

Funding

  1. National Human Genetic Resources Sharing Service Platform [2005DKA21300]
  2. Scientific Research Fund of Zhejiang Provincial Education Department of China [Y202045589]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Our study found that MRT patients have two peak periods of incidence, with worse survival rates for children (especially those under 1 year) compared to adults. Different primary sites are associated with different age groups and survival outcomes. Surgery for primary site tumors should be considered for renal and digestive system MRTs, while systematic therapy including surgery and radiotherapy is recommended for CNS, bone, and soft tissue MRTs.
Objective: Malignant rhabdoid tumor (MRT) is a rare but aggressive malignancy. It has been a long time since data on this tumor have been updated. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed patients from the SEER database who were pathologically diagnosed with MRT and analyzed incidence rates, clinical features and survival using Stata 12.0. Results: In total, 544 patients were included in the epidemiological analysis. There were two peak periods of MRT incidence: patients younger than 4 years and those older than 70 years. Further survival analysis showed that the survival of children (especially younger than 1 year) was markedly worse than that of adults (P<0.01), and different primary sites were associated with different age groups and survival outcomes. The central nervous system (CNS) was the most common primary site (50.00%), followed by the kidney (15.66%). Patients with MRTs that originated from the digestive system experienced worse survival outcomes than those with MRTs originating from other locations. Primary site surgery conferred survival benefits to patients with renal and digestive system MRTs (HR = 0.06, CI: 0.02-0.23, P<0.01; HR=0.10, CI: 0.02-0.48, P<0.01), whereas radiotherapy conferred benefits to patients with CNS, bone and soft tissue MRTs (HR=0.22, CI: 0.15-0.34, P<0.01; HR=0.44, CI: 0.21-0.90 P=0.03). Conclusions: Our results indicate that age and the primary site of MRT are critical clinical factors that affect patient survival and treatment choices. Primary site tumor resection should be considered for renal and digestive system MRTs, and systematic therapy, including surgery and radiotherapy, should be recommended for the treatment of CNS, bone and soft tissue MRTs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available