4.6 Article

miR-361-3p Regulates Liver Tumor-initiating Cells Expansion and Chemo-resistance

Journal

JOURNAL OF CANCER
Volume 12, Issue 5, Pages 1483-1492

Publisher

IVYSPRING INT PUBL
DOI: 10.7150/jca.52395

Keywords

Tumor-initiating cells; hepatocellular carcinoma; miR-361-3p; SOX1; cisplatin; sorafenib

Categories

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81672718]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Evidence suggests that miR-361-3p plays a crucial role in the expansion of liver tumor-initiating cells (T-ICs) and their response to TACE or sorafenib treatment. Upregulation of miR-361-3p enhances self-renewal and tumorigenicity of liver T-ICs, while knockdown of miR-361-3p impairs these abilities. Furthermore, miR-361-3p directly targets SOX1 in liver T-ICs, revealing its potential as a therapeutic target for the prevention and intervention in HCC.
Increasing evidence shows that liver tumor-initiating cells (T-ICs) closely associated with the progression, metastasis, recurrence and chemo-resistance of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, the underlying mechanism for the propagation of liver T-ICs remains unclear. Here we show that miR-361-3p is upregulated in liver T-ICs. Knockdown of miR-361-3p impairs the self-renewal and tumorigenicity liver T-ICs. Conversely, forced miR-361-3p expression enhances the self-renewal and tumorigenicity liver T-ICs. Mechanistically, miR-361-3p directly targets SOX1 via binding its 3'-UTR in liver T-ICs. Moreover, miR-361-3p knockdown hepatoma cells are more sensitive to cisplatin or sorafenib treatment. Clinical cohort analysis demonstrates that miR-361-3p low HCC patients are benefited from TACE (transcatheter arterial chemoembolization) or sorafenib treatment. In conclusion, our findings revealed the crucial role of the miR-361-3p in liver T-IC expansion and TACE or sorafenib response, rendering miR-361-3p an optimal target for the prevention and intervention in HCC.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available