4.7 Article

Interpersonal relationships, digital technologies, and innovation in entrepreneurial ventures

Journal

JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH
Volume 125, Issue -, Pages 495-507

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.09.003

Keywords

Knowledge sourcing; Knowledge quality; Innovativeness; Interpersonal relationships; New ventures

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study reveals that innovativeness of parent companies and co-inventors significantly influences the quality of knowledge developed by entrepreneurial ventures, with this impact enhanced when superior information technology systems are in place. Geographically proximate innovations also provide benefits to venture knowledge quality, though this effect is mitigated in regions with greater adoption of computer technologies.
Innovation research has not presented an integrated model of how knowledge sources emerging from managers' interpersonal relationships facilitate innovation within new ventures. Further, it remains unclear how such knowledge transfer may be shaped by the advance of digital technologies. This study examines how these knowledge sources and the context of the digital technologies in which they are produced influence the quality of knowledge developed by entrepreneurial ventures. Our results show that parent firm and co-inventor innovativeness significantly impact venture knowledge quality, with this benefit significantly enhanced when parents possess superior information technology systems. We also find that geographically proximate innovations provide similar benefits, though they are mitigated in regions with greater adoption of computer technologies. We test our predictions on a sample of 632 biotechnology ventures founded over a ten-year period, tracking their innovations over a subsequent ten-year period. We contribute to research on entrepreneurship, geographic location, and knowledge creation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available