4.6 Article

Intermediate type-I superconductors in the mesoscopic scale

Journal

PHYSICAL REVIEW B
Volume 103, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.103.014504

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Brazilian Agency Fundacao de Amparo Pesquisa do Estado de Sao Paulo (FAPESP) [20/03947-2, 12/04388-0]
  2. FACEPE [APQ-0198-1.05/14]
  3. CAPES [APQ-0198-1.05/14]
  4. NVIDIA Corporation
  5. Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Sao Paulo (FAPESP) [20/03947-2, 12/04388-0] Funding Source: FAPESP

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The passage discusses the existence of an intermediate type-I superconductor proposed by Tinkham and de Gennes, as well as the features of mesoscopic superconductors and the extension of the Tinkham-de Gennes scenario through the standard Ginzburg-Landau theory.
M. Tinkham [Introduction to Superconductivity, 2nd ed. (Dover, Mineola, NY, 2004), Chap. 4, pp. 135-138] and P. G. de Gennes [Superconductivity of Metals andAlloys (Benjamin, New York, 1966), Chap. 6, pp. 199-201] described the existence of an intermediate type-I superconductor as a consequence of an external surface that affects the well-known classification of superconductors into type I and II. Here we consider the mesoscopic superconductor where the volume-to-area ratio is small and the effects of the external surface are enhanced. By means of the standard Ginzburg-Landau theory, the Tinkham-de Gennes scenario is extended to the mesoscopic type-I superconductor. We find additional features of the transition at the passage from the genuine to the intermediate type I. The latter has two distinct transitions, namely from a paramagnetic to diamagnetic response in descending field, and a quasi-type-II behavior as the critical coupling 1/root 2 is approached in ascending field. The intermediate type-I phase proposed here, and its corresponding transitions, reflect intrinsic features of the superconductor and not its geometrical properties.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available