4.5 Article

Changes of epiglottis and hyoid bone position after orthodontic treatment with cast splint fixed functional appliances

Journal

CLINICAL ORAL INVESTIGATIONS
Volume 25, Issue 3, Pages 1525-1534

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00784-020-03460-9

Keywords

Class II; Fixed functional appliance; Functional mandibular advancer; Herbst appliance; Epiglottis; Hyoid bone position

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study compared the treatment effects of mandibular advancement using different fixed functional appliances in Class II malocclusion patients. Both appliances caused anterior and caudal displacement of the epiglottis and hyoid bone, as well as an enlargement of the posterior airway space. The Herbst appliance showed slightly greater therapeutic effects, although not significantly.
Objectives Angle Class II malocclusions including a retrognathic mandible are the most frequent orthodontic problems. Both removable and fixed functional appliances can be used for mandibular advancement. Mandibular advancement after treatment with any fixed functional appliance has numerous therapeutic effects, such as stretching of masticatory muscles, ligaments, membranes and surrounding soft tissues, thus causing positional changes of the hyoid bone and epiglottis. This retrospective study investigates and compares treatment effects upon epiglottis- and hyoid bone position and posterior airway space in class II patients who received mandibular advancement through two different cast splint fixed functional appliances. Material and methods Two groups of 21 patients each ('Functional Mandibular Advancer' (FMA) and Herbst appliance) were investigated. The same experienced orthodontist performed the treatment in all patients, employing a single-step advancement protocol. The mandible always received initial protrusion into an edge-to-edge position. Conventional lateral cephalograms were available pre-treatment (T1) and immediately after appliance removal (T2) for all patients. The measurements comprised (I) hyoid bone, (II) epiglottis or (III) posterior airway space. Treatment-related changes were analysed with one-sample Student's t tests for intragroup comparisons and independent Student's t tests for intergroup comparisons. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. Results Measurements of the hyoid bone showed mostly increases for both appliances after treatment. Intergroup comparisons were not significant for FMA patients but significant for selected measurements in Herbst appliance patients. Intergroup comparisons showed insignificant changes. The posterior airway space was always insignificantly increased after treatment. The greatest increase was found caudally. Intergroup comparisons showed insignificant changes. Conclusions Both fixed functional appliances cause an anterior and caudal displacement of epiglottis and hyoid bone and enlarge the posterior airway space. The therapeutic effects of the Herbst appliance are slightly larger, although not significantly. Clinical relevance Treatment with either Herbst appliance of FMA alters the hyoid bone position and enlarges the posterior airway space. Still, long-termdata are as yet unavailable; it remains unknown if the effects upon posterior airway space remain stable, and if a resulting posterior airway space enlargement may have clinical influence upon obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available