4.0 Review

Abdominal cystic lymphangioma mimicking ovarian mass: A case report and literature review

Journal

MOLECULAR AND CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
Volume 14, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

SPANDIDOS PUBL LTD
DOI: 10.3892/mco.2020.2202

Keywords

abdominal cyst; lymphangioma; omentum; ovary; ultrasonography

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Cystic lymphangiomas are rare in the adult population, with most cases found in the neck and axillary regions. Synchronous imaging examinations and full preoperative evaluation are crucial for diagnosis and decision-making in cases of large intraabdominal lesions.
Cystic lymphangiomas are uncommon benign lesions extremely rare in the adult population. Most cases are found in the neck and axillary regions; while <1% of patients present with cystic lymphangiomas in the mesentery, greater omentum and retroperitoneum. The present report describes a rare case of large omental lymphangioma mimicking ovarian mass. A 40-year-old G2P2 female patient presented without symptoms for routine gynecological examination. Transvaginal ultrasound examination revealed a cystic mass with a maximum diameter of 10 cm localized at the right parametrium space, suggestive of large cystic lesion of the right ovary. Further preoperative evaluation by magnetic resonance imaging indicated that the mass was either cystic lymphangioma or mesenteric cyst. Complete excision of the cyst without need for gastrectomy was performed via laparotomy under general anaesthesia. Histology revealed omental lymphangioma. Most abdominal lymphangiomas are initially asymptomatic. The role of synchronous imaging examinations, such as ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging, in diagnosis of these lesions is crucial. Full preoperative differential diagnosis evaluation in cases of large intraabdominal lesions is required in order to decide the appropriate surgical approach and management.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available