4.6 Review

Targeting axon guidance cues for neural circuit repair after spinal cord injury

Journal

JOURNAL OF CEREBRAL BLOOD FLOW AND METABOLISM
Volume 41, Issue 2, Pages 197-205

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/0271678X20961852

Keywords

Spinal cord injury; axon guidance; Wnts; planar cell polarity pathway; Ryk

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Most spinal cord injury cases are anatomically incomplete, with potential for functional restoration through new axon growth and synaptic connections. Rehabilitation can partially restore function, but limitations and uncertainties still exist.
At least two-thirds of spinal cord injury cases are anatomically incomplete, without complete spinal cord transection, although the initial injuries cause complete loss of sensory and motor functions. The malleability of neural circuits and networks allows varied extend of functional restoration in some individuals after successful rehabilitative training. However, in most cases, the efficiency and extent are both limited and uncertain, largely due to the many obstacles of repair. The restoration of function after anatomically incomplete injury is in part made possible by the growth of new axons or new axon branches through the spared spinal cord tissue and the new synaptic connections they make, either along the areas they grow through or in the areas they terminate. This review will discuss new progress on the understanding of the role of axon guidance molecules, particularly the Wnt family proteins, in spinal cord injury and how the knowledge and tools of axon guidance can be applied to increase the potential of recovery. These strategies, combined with others, such as neuroprotection and rehabilitation, may bring new promises. The recovery strategies for anatomically incomplete spinal cord injuries are relevant and may be applicable to traumatic brain injury and stroke.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available