4.4 Article

Impacts of course activities on student perceptions of engagement and learning online

Journal

DISTANCE EDUCATION
Volume 42, Issue 1, Pages 106-125

Publisher

ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/01587919.2020.1869525

Keywords

interactive course activities; online learning; student engagement; instructional context; latent profile analysis

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study examined the impact of course activities on student perceptions of engagement and learning in online courses. Three distinct groups of instructional contexts were identified based on students' perceptions, with highly interactive courses having the most favorable impact on student engagement and learning outcomes. Implications for instruction professionals and future research directions were discussed.
The purpose of the study was to examine the impacts of course activities on student perceptions of engagement and learning in online courses. Using eight interactive course activities as indicators of course interactivity, we conducted a latent profile analysis to cluster students into different groups. Based on students' perceptions, we observed three distinct groups of instructional contexts: (a) courses with low student-student but high student-instructor interactions (Low S-S but High S-I Interactions; 25.3%), (b) courses that mainly utilize group discussions (Group Discussion Focused; 20.2%), and (c) courses with high student-student and high student-instructor interactions (High S-S and S-I Interactions; 54.4%). Students' perceptions of engagement and learning outcomes varied across groups. Notably, students in the highly interactive courses (High S-S and S-I Interactions) reported the most favorable perceptions of engagement and learning outcomes, compared to students in the other two groups. Implications for instruction professionals and future research directions are discussed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available