4.2 Article

Comparison of Liver Transplantation and Liver Resection for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients with Portal Vein Tumor Thrombus Type I and Type II

Journal

YONSEI MEDICAL JOURNAL
Volume 62, Issue 1, Pages 29-40

Publisher

YONSEI UNIV COLL MEDICINE
DOI: 10.3349/ymj.2021.62.1.29

Keywords

Hepatocellular carcinoma; liver transplantation; liver resection; portal vein tumor thrombus

Funding

  1. Key Project of Science and Technology, Tianjin Municipal Science and Technology Bureau [19YFZCSY00020]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Liver transplantation (LT) appeared to provide better prognosis for HCC patients with PVTT type I compared to liver resection (LR), especially in patients with AFP levels >200 ng/mL. There were no significant differences in prognosis between LT and LR for patients with PVTT type II. Risk factors for recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) included treatment allocation (LR), tumor size (>5 cm), AFP and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) levels.
Purpose: The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of liver transplantation (LT) and liver resection (LR) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients with portal vein tumor thrombus (PVTT) and to investigate risk factors affecting prognosis. Materials and Methods: A total of 94 HCC patients with PVTT type I (segmental PVTT) and PVTT type II (lobar PVTT) were involved and divided into LR (n=47) and IT groups (n=47). Recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were compared before and after inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW). Prognostic factors for RFS and OS were explored. Results: Two treatment groups were well-balanced using IPTW. In the entire cohort, LT provided a better prognosis than LR. Among patients with PVTT type I, RFS was better with LT (p=0.039); OS was not different significantly between LT and LR (p=0.093). In subgroup analysis of PVTT type I patients with alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) levels >200 ng/ml, IT elicited significantly longer median RFS (18.0 months vs. 2.1 months, p=0.022) and relatively longer median OS time (23.6 months vs. 9.8 months, p=0.065). Among patients with PVTT type II, no significant differences in RFS and OS were found between LT and LR (p=0.115 and 0.335, respectively). Multivariate analyses showed treatment allocation (LR), tumor size (>5 cm), AFP and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) levels to be risk factors RFS and treatment allocation (LR), APP and AST as risk factors for OS. Conclusion: IT appeared to afford a better prognosis for HCC with PVTT type I than LR, especially in patients with AFP levels >200 ng/mL.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available