4.3 Review

The Effectiveness of the Transtheoretical Model to Improve Physical Activity in Healthy Adults: A Systematic Review

Journal

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL ACTIVITY & HEALTH
Volume 18, Issue 1, Pages 94-108

Publisher

HUMAN KINETICS PUBL INC
DOI: 10.1123/jpah.2020-0334

Keywords

health promotion; exercise; interventions; health behavior

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The effectiveness of interventions based on the transtheoretical model to improve physical activity in adult populations is inconsistent, and the delivery of materials and the stage of study participants at baseline may play a role in the success of the interventions.
Background: Despite the known risks of physical inactivity, only 50% of adults meet the recommended guidelines for physical activity (PA). Therefore, numerous interventions have been designed to increase PA across a lifespan. The purpose of this systematic review was to determine the effectiveness of interventions based on the transtheoretical model to improve PA in healthy adults. Methods: Electronic databases (CINAHL, MEDLINE, Psychology & Behavioral Sciences Collection, PsycINFO, Sociological Collection, and SPORTDiscus) were systematically searched from January 2001 to May 2020. Results: A total of 11 randomized pretest-posttest studies were included in this review. Ten studies utilized a subjective measurement of PA, and 3 studies included an objective measure. Five studies demonstrated significant improvements in PA for the transtheoretical model-based intervention groups compared with control/comparison groups; however, 6 studies demonstrated no differences between groups. Conclusion: The findings suggest that there is inconsistent evidence to support the use of interventions based on the transtheoretical model to improve PA in adult populations. Interventions were more successful when materials were delivered via in-person counseling and when study participants were in the precontemplation or contemplation phases at baseline.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available