4.7 Article

Polycystic Ovary Syndrome and Risk of Type 2 Diabetes, Coronary Heart Disease, and Stroke

Journal

DIABETES
Volume 70, Issue 2, Pages 627-637

Publisher

AMER DIABETES ASSOC
DOI: 10.2337/db20-0800

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Eris M. Field Chair in Diabetes Research

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Genetically predicted PCOS showed no association with the risk of diabetes, coronary heart disease, or stroke, suggesting that PCOS itself does not increase the risk of these outcomes. The association between PCOS and cardiometabolic diseases may be explained by other features of PCOS such as obesity, elevated testosterone, and low sex hormone binding globulin. Efforts to prevent cardiometabolic complications in PCOS should target women with high-risk features rather than all women with PCOS.
Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) has been associated with diabetes and cardiovascular disease; however, whether the relationship is causal is uncertain. We conducted a two-sample Mendelian randomization study to investigate the associations of PCOS with type 2 diabetes, coronary heart disease (CHD), and stroke. Association between PCOS and diabetes risk was examined in European and Asian cohorts, both sex specific and sex combined. Causal effects of PCOS on risks of CHD and stroke were evaluated in European cohorts. Stroke was analyzed as any stroke as well as four subtypes of stroke (ischemic, large artery, cardioembolic, small vessel). We found no association of genetically predicted PCOS with risk of diabetes, CHD, or stroke. This suggests that PCOS in and of itself does not increase the risk of these outcomes. Other features of PCOS (obesity, elevated testosterone, low sex hormone binding globulin) may explain the association between PCOS and cardiometabolic diseases. In light of these results, efforts to prevent cardiometabolic complications in PCOS should focus on women with high-risk features rather than all women with PCOS.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available