4.6 Article

Investigating the Impact of Actual and Modeled Occupant Behavior Information Input to Building Performance Simulation

Journal

BUILDINGS
Volume 11, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/buildings11010032

Keywords

building performance simulation; occupant behavior modeling; on– site survey; co-simulation; mutual impact quantification

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper quantifies the impact of different occupant behavior information on building energy model from multiple perspectives. Through simulation experiments, the study analyzes the differences between three BEM models with constant, actual, and modeled occupant behavioral inputs, providing insights into how occupant behaviors influence building performance. The research aims to facilitate robust building design and operation with human-in-the-loop system optimization.
Occupant behaviors are one of the most dominant factors that influence building energy use. Understanding the influences from building occupants can promote the development of energy-efficient buildings. This paper quantifies the impact of different occupant behavior information on building energy model (BEM) from multiple perspectives. For this purpose, an occupant behavior model that uses agent-based modeling (ABM) approach is implemented via co-simulation with a BEM of an existing commercial building. Then, actual occupant behavior data in correspondence to ABM output, including operations on window, door, and blinds in selected thermal zones of the building are recorded using survey logs. A simulation experiment is conducted by creating three BEMs with constant, actual, and modeled occupant behavioral inputs. The analysis of the simulation results among these scenarios helps us gain an in-depth understanding of how occupant behaviors influence building performance. This study aims to facilitate robust building design and operation with human-in-the-loop system optimization.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available