4.2 Article

Rainfall variability and socio-economic constraints on livestock production in the Ngorongoro Conservation Area, Tanzania

Journal

SN APPLIED SCIENCES
Volume 3, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

SPRINGER INT PUBL AG
DOI: 10.1007/s42452-020-04111-0

Keywords

Climate variability; Pastoralist perceptions; Rangelands; Eastern Africa; Adaptive capacity

Funding

  1. African Development Bank (AfDB) [210015503281]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Rainfall variability is crucial for small-scale farmers and pastoralists in East Africa, particularly in the Ngorongoro Conservation Area of Tanzania. Pastoralists are aware of climate change impacts and perceive erratic rainfall patterns as a major challenge. Increasing herd sizes and mobility do not necessarily protect households from climate change shocks. Enhancing adaptive capacity and profitability of pastoral cattle production under changing environmental conditions are recommended for interventions.
Rainfall variability is of great importance in East Africa, where small-scale farmers and pastoralists dominate. Their livestock production activities are heavily dependent on rainfall. We assessed pastoralist perceptions on climate change, particularly rainfall variability, its impact on livestock production, and the adaptive capacity of pastoralists in the Ngorongoro Conservation Area (NCA), Tanzania. We combined 241 household interviews and information from 52 participants of Participatory Rural Appraisal (PRA) with archived data from the Ngorongoro Conservation Area Authority (NCAA). We found that most (71%) pastoralists were aware of general climate change impacts, rainfall variability, and impacts of extreme events on their livestock. Most (> 75%) respondents perceived erratic and reduced amounts of rainfall, prolonged and frequent periods of drought as the main climate change challenges. Mean annual rainfall accounted for only 46% (R-2), (p = 0.076) and 32% (R-2), (p = 0.22) of cattle, and sheep and goat population variability, respectively. Unexpectedly, cattle losses intensified by 10% when herd size increased (p < 0.001) and by 98% (p = 0.049) when mobility increased, implying that increasing herd sizes and mobility do not cushion households against climate change shocks. Our study highlights the need to enhance adaptive capacity of the pastoralist communities through interventions that proactively reduce vulnerability. We recommend that future research should address the profitability of pastoral cattle production under changing environmental conditions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available